Can We Avoid a Deep Depression? Lessons From 1929-1933

The crash of 1929 gave rise to a decade of hardship and despair. Is history repeating itself? Will the 2008 crash turn into another Great Depression? Or, will 2009 bring once a once in a lifetime opportunity for recovery? Have we leaned from the mistakes made in 1929-1933 or did we repeat those mistakes in 2008?

Easy Credit & Generous Mortgage Lending

The too generous mortgage lending and free flowing credit that led up to the 2008 crash was similar in some ways - yet also different - from the "Roaring 20s" that led to the 1929 Crash and Great Depression.

Before the 1920’s little credit was available and people saved up enough money to pay cash for a new car, home or other large purchase. But ideas of hard work, thrift and frugality changes quickly in the 1920’s. Wall Street becomes the way of instant gratification and quick profits. Women for the first time became significant participants in the stock market. Beauty parlors had ticker tapes installed for women to do their trading while having their hair done. People were caught up in the market frenzy where you could buy stocks on margin (credit) where the buyer only had to put down 10 to 20 percent of his own money and thus borrowed 80 to 90 percent of the cost of the stock.

Buying on margin can be very risky. If the price of stock fell lower than the loan amount, the broker would likely issue a "margin call," which means that the buyer must come up with the cash to pay back his loan immediately.

We still can buy on margin today but not nearly to the extent as in the 1920’s. Before 1929, people were trading 10 to 1 on margin. Now they can really only trade on margin of about 2 to 1. However hedge funds are able to leverage ridiculous amounts of money such as 20 to 1. Huge hedge fund losses helped propel the downward market spiral in 2008 as investors wanted out and loans were called.

As in the 1920’s home ownership in the last 10 years was considered the "American Dream" President Bush declared we would be an "ownership society."

President Bush especially encouraged more minority home ownership. President Bush addressed the White House Conference on Increasing Minority Homeownership Oct. 15, 2002 saying: "You see, we want everybody in America to own their own home. That’s what we want. This is — an ownership society is a compassionate society… yet we have a problem here in America because fewer than half of the Hispanics and half the African Americans own the home. That’s a homeownership gap. It’s a — it’s a gap that we’ve got to work together to close for the good of our country, for the sake of a more hopeful future. We’ve got to work to knock down the barriers that have created a homeownership gap.

I set an ambitious goal. It’s one that I believe we can achieve. It’s a clear goal, that by the end of this decade we’ll increase the number of minority homeowners by at least 5.5 million families. (Applause.) … And it’s going to require a strong commitment from those of you involved in the housing industry."

His speech goes on about how we need to make it easier to buy homes with programs for those that can not afford a down payment or have enough income to meet requirements. He introduced government assistance programs to help get financing and especially using Fannie and Freddie to provide financing.

The result was the huge housing boom with easy financing that led to the bursting bubble with loose lending standards just as Bush had encouraged.  Wall Street made huge profits by packaging loans in complicated derivatives and mortgage backed securities, selling them to financial institutions worldwide. The theory was to reduce risk by large pools of diversified mortgages which the rating agencies often rated AAA – their highest rating.

Deregulation

The beginning or the era of deregulation began in 1981 with Ronald Reagan who said, "I put a freeze on pending regulations and set up a task force under Vice President Bush to review regulations with an eye toward getting rid of as many as possible."

Despite setbacks such as the 1987 Savings and Loan collapses and the junk bond scandals of Michael Milken and Ivan Boesky President Clinton continued to press Congress for more deregulation as did Alan Greenspan as Federal Reserve Chairman.

In the early 2000’s the Republicans in Congress pushed massive deregulation of financial markets. Senator Phil Gramm is the influential Republican chairman of the Senate Banking Committee and in 2008 was McCain’s economic advisor.

Gramm opened a June 21, 2000 hearing with a call for "regulatory relief." And said, "I think we would do well to remember the Lincoln adage that to ask a society to live under old and outmoded laws -- and I think you could say the same about regulation -- is like asking a man to wear the same clothes he wore when he was a boy." That was actually not Lincoln, but Thomas Jefferson.

"But Gramm was also wrong about deregulation which contributed to the huge bust on Wall Street in 2008. When capitalism becomes unfettered you can see the consequences," said Andy Serwer, Editor of Fortune Magazine.

In 2005 Democrats in Congress tried to pass a bill to restrict subprime lending but it was opposed by Republicans led by House Majority Leader Tom DeLay as well as some other Democrats.

The Republicans have a long history of opposing regulation believing that the market was self-correcting and you needed to have a free flow of capital as well as tax cuts for the richest. This goes back to Ronald Reagan’s "supply side economics," where benefits would "trickle down." George Bush Sr. in 1980 correctly called it "voodoo economics"

We were in an era of market based economics as well as the now proven failure of "trickle down economics" where helping the wealthy in theory trickles down to the poor and middle class.

Especially in the last 8 years, this idea has resulted in a massive shifting of wealth to the already most wealthy at the expense of the majority of Americans. The million dollar bonuses flourished on Wall Street while Main Street suffers the most from the economic collapse.

Reacting to Crisis

In 1929 on "black Tuesday" the market dropped about 20% in one-day which created a liquidity crisis. Between 1929 and 1932 the stock market lost 90% of its value.

One lesson learned from the 1929 crash is that the government has to react quickly. President Hebert Hoover’s Treasury Secretary in 1929 was former banker Andrew Mellon who announced that the Federal Reserve would simply stand by while the market worked itself out and by letting the free market work it was a way of promoting economic growth. This was a disastrous decision in retrospect which resulted in the crash and the Great Depression as well as just like today a widening gap between the rich and the poor.

In the 1920’s there was no SEC and virtually no regulation of Wall Street at all. Brokers made their own rules which led to corruption. Big money was made and tax cuts on capital gains and the wealthy allowed the rich to hold on to more of their money.

Today U.S. individual tax rates have dropped to historic lows – among the lowest in the world while at the same time we are not paying for the war in Iraq, we are building up huge financial deficits and ignoring the crisis coming to pay for Social Security, Medicare and needed health care reform.

In the 1990’s and 2000’s executive pay skyrocket with CEO’s typically making $10 million or more plus private jets and other perks. But the middle class didn’t see much of this prosperity and relied on borrowing on increasing home values and credit card debt.

In 2008 the party ended like in 1929. In the 1920’s the bubble that burst wasn’t a housing bubble like today but a stock bubble far greater than the technology stock bubble we had in 2000-2001.

In the 1920’s excessive speculation drove stock prices far beyond any relationship to the value of the companies. Today we are almost in a reverse stock market bubble with fear driving values far below what most consider the real value of many companies. Today we are in the bust of the housing bubble with about 25% of homeowners with mortgages that are more than their home is now worth after so many foreclosures have driven down prices.

What started as a subprime mortgage crisis is now a crisis for even prime mortgage borrowers with loss of jobs and spiraling down home values. Even those with perfect credit may not be able to refinance since their homes have lost so much value vs. existing debt.

2008 vs. 1929 Similarities and Differences

In both crashes consumer credit dried up for both business and consumers. After 1929 credit froze solid and people could not get money from their banks which ran out of cash and there was no FDIC to insure bank deposits. Panic followed as many lost their life savings not just in the market collapse but lost all their savings in banks. 785 banks closed the first year. By 1932 five thousand banks had gone broke.

By 1933 20 million or 25% of the workforce was unemployed and another 25% worked for reduced hours or reduced pay. There were no food stamps and no unemployment insurance, just bread lines and millions of previously middle class or well off families now in poverty and homeless. This lasted a decade resulting in broken families and suicide rates the highest in U.S. history.

Today we have about the same 20 million unemployed if you count those that have given up and are not included in the official unemployment numbers. But it is only about 10% of the larger workforce today

In the run up to the Great Depression President Hoover’s administration was slow to react believing the economy would correct itself. All the major political figures assured everyone in ways similar to President Bush in early 2008 that the fundamentals of the economy were strong.

In 2008 the government was trying to avert a financial collapse. The Bush Administration decided it could not allow major financial institutions to fail. This was not the case in 1929.

After the 1929 crash Hoover’s failed attempts to fix it made him very unpopular. Many mistakes were made. The government made a series of disastrous policy moves. The Fed kept money tight and increased interest rates. In 1932 they tried to balance the budget by raising taxes up to a 79% top rate, resulting in what had been a rapidly declining economy to fall off a cliff. Then a $2.5 billion bailout of the financial system was too little too late and in 1933 the economy hit bottom.

Federal Reserve Chief Ben Bernanke has extensively studied the Great Depression. In late September 2008 he urged swift action by Congress to pass the $700 billion TARP plan. By late 2008 the Fed moved very aggressively and very quickly to fill the gap left by the Treasury when it abandonment of the purpose of the TARP. The Bush administration acted primarily to help banks and financial institutions. But the actions failed to "trickle down" or help the foreclosure crisis and job losses plummeted.

By the fall of 1932 the nation was convinced it needed a new leader. FDR offered his country a "New Deal" offering bold solutions for the economy. By 1935 large jobs programs were created to improve the infrastructure of the nation and get people back to work.

Today’s "New Deal" is the "American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan" of Barack Obama who has surrounded himself with some of the best financial minds on the planet including some from the prosperous days of the Clinton Administration with budge surpluses, a great economy and respect in the world. He has proposed a huge program both to get people back to work by investing in projects that will help the nation in many ways as well as attempting to address the home foreclosure crisis which has so far had far too little emphasis and as a result is rapidly getting worse.

In 1933 FDR with a new Democratic majority in Congress proposed a flurry of programs to get the nation back on its feet and spoke in his famous radio "fireside chats." FDR was able to convey to the country a new confidence, assurance and sensitivity to people’s needs and their trauma that lifts the mood of the country.

The government mobilized as if at war to rescue the economy. The SEC was created to regulate Wall Street. Money was poured into banks to enable them to reopen and the FDIC was created to assure that deposits were safe.

FDR created many new programs that we still rely upon today including social security, unemployment insurance, minimum wage laws, workers compensation and disability insurance.

However the economy did not recover to pre-crash levels in the 1930’s. The New Deal while helping millions did not succeed in solving all the economic problems. It was World War II that brings back the economy out of the long slump. The New Deal cost of about $500 billion was not enough. The $3.65 trillion spend on the War was enough to bring back the economy to life at last and employment returned to pre-crash levels in 1943.

The lesson for today is that we need to have a large enough stimulus program to solve the problem especially the rapidly spiraling job layoffs. Policies have to be directed where it will do the most good – jobs, the housing crisis, and availability of credit to business and consumers.

The purpose of the $700 billion "TARP" program was to infuse banks with capital so they would start lending again. But of the $350 billion authorized most of it has gone into banks that didn’t even ask for capital. Despite this infusion banks are not lending.  Even new loans are discounted for risk in the secondary market. Banks can buy existing loans at a big discount so why make new risky loans?  They also have to pay 5% interest to the Treasury and for many banks on the "bail out" they didn't want or need.

Near the end of 2008 another crisis arose in non banking credit like auto loans and credit cards. The Fed was proactive but the credit crisis continues.

How we deal with this crisis will determine how soon we will have an economic recovery. We need strong bold action, more than the "New Deal" but with the leadership and confidence building leadership of FDR. Many believe Obama has the opportunity to avoid the mistakes of the Great Depression and provide the FDR type of leadership to turn around the economy.

However some Republicans in Congress want to slow down the solutions needed with their hands off attitude and concern about the deficit.

The BIG Deficit

What better time if we had to have a huge deficit with all time low interest rates on Treasury borrowing? So far the Treasury is easily selling debt at record low interest rates. Actions to avoid a Depression are far more critical than the deficit. Unemployed workers don’t pay taxes, corporate tax revenues decline and many States have a serious budget crisis with declining sales tax revenues and state income taxes with high unemployment rates.

Assuming we don’t fall off a cliff into a deep depression, the actions of the Treasury should create future profits to help the deficit long-term.

If we are to avoid the mistakes of the Great Depression we have to act quickly and boldly.

The views and opinions expressed by Dave Hutchison, CFP are as of the date of the report, and are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions. The material contained herein is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, since recommendations will vary based on a client’s goals and objectives. Information is believed to be from reliable sources; however, no representation is made as to its accuracy. All economic and performance information is historical and not indicative of future results. Please consult one of our financial advisors for more information. Hutchison Investment Advisors, Inc. is an Arizona registered investment advisor. Part II of Form ADV (Disclosure Statement) has been given advisory clients and is available upon request and is at www.davecfp.com 

Return to Main Page

We Take Your Financial Future As Seriously as YOU SHOULD !
Large enough to serve yet small enough to care
Committed to Success Through Client Satisfaction


Securities are offered through Multi-Financial Securities Corp, Member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advice is offered through Hutchison Investment Advisors, Inc, a Registered Investment Advisor. Multi-Financial Securities Corp. is not an affiliated company of Hutchison Investment Advisors, Inc., or Hutchison Financial Advisors.

CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNERTM and are certification marks owned by the Certified Financial Planning Board of Standards, Inc. These marks are awarded to individuals who successfully complete the CFP Board's initial and ongoing certification requirements.